To what extent does the European Union policy of free movement of Essay

To what extent does the European core policy of wanton crusade of persons discriminate against the non-European others - Essay ExampleThe paper tells that the EU (European Union) policy concerning free movement inside its member states has, in many quarters been taunted to be extremely invidious in nature.This policy on free movement of persons tend to, in particular, discriminate against people from other part of the land- the non Europeans, commonly referred to as others. The E.Us hostility towards immigrants has been talk overed at length in various forums. A real important aspect of the said immigration policy that many find not friendly is in the treatment of people who are from troubled countries, for instance due to problems like wars, lawlessness and require human-centred assistance like, for instance refugees. In most cases helpless and poor or stateless individuals who basically leave out themselves around or on the mercy and sympathy of the state that they deem s afe, seeking refuge from sick of(p) treatment in their country of origin pay off always had it rough upon attempting to gain entry in countries that subscribe to the European Union. For the sake of highlighting the xenophobic treatment and approach that immigrants face countries like France, unite Kingdom and Italy will be used because they are believed to be precise notorious for this kind of discriminative treatment. Majority of these member states always claim that with the steady rise of terrorism and related activities worldwide they have all the reasons to be discriminative against anybody coming into their country. Another commonly blamed excuse, which to them is a major concern, is the national and regional security of the various nations that allow people to cross over their borders. They have this mentality that terrorists and other people with ill intensions are very likely to come in from overseas2. These kinds of concerns and worries often lead to very thorough an d intrusive security checks and scrutiny and stringent visa requirements and in the process discouraging immigration, on the spur of the moment term and temporary visitors from other parts of the world and even the movement that people like having at bottom their continent and countries. There has been frantic search to solutions to this tight regulations and even pressure from all over the world for European Union to loosen some of the aspects of the immigration policy and inspections to create an ample environment which net help promote tourism and other developmental aspects like relocation and transfer of businesses to other countries from, for instance, destabilized countries or better yet regions3. Since most of the member states of the European Union allow free movement of individuals within the union under an exemption commonly known as Schengen arrangement which many immigrant refers to as the discriminative extra communitarian movement of individuals i.e. non-European U nion citizens4. This is, indeed an irony in the sense that the European Union allows movement of individuals freely within its various member states but unfortunately takes a very tough and caustic approach towards immigrants from non European Union countries. This xenophobic treatment and approach of the European Union is basically grow in very complex historical, political, social and economic contexts which this paper intends to intensively and extensively look and discuss in details. Historical Historically, even before the establishment of the European Union, most of the countries that are now in the union had a negative attitude towards people moving into their countries because they believed that such moves would create competition for the on hand(predicate) resources .The historical perspective and aspects of the heinous xenophobic approach that EU had, greatly affected the ambitions and desires of many immigrants who really yearned to visit or even temporarily move into the EU